It is easy to understand why Egypt would feel so frustrated after their 3-2 defeat in the last 16.
The Africans had led 2-0 with 11 minutes to play, and were on the brink of a historic first-ever quarter-final appearance.
But it all went wrong as Argentina stormed back and scored the winner in stoppage time.
Egypt said there was something more suspect at play. They put their exit down to “serious refereeing mistakes” and “double standards” from French referee Francois Letexier and his team.
The Pharaohs had a goal ruled out through a VAR intervention.
They also claimed Argentina’s winner should have been disallowed, and a penalty awarded to them instead.
Mostafa Zico’s brilliant goal was chalked off after Marwan Attia was penalised for stepping on the foot of Lisandro Martinez at the start of the move.
It was controversial, but they were leading 1-0 and did score a second goal nine minutes later. You cannot prove the game would have taken a different path had Zico’s goal stood.
Egypt believed there were two potential penalty claims in their favour before Fernandez headed home the clinching goal.
Hamdi Fathy went to ground claiming he was held by Alexis Mac Allister, which was unclear on replays, while Mohamed Salah felt he was tripped by Julian Alvarez.
There were some similarities between the Martinez and Salah situations, with foot-on-foot contact, but not enough to constitute a penalty.
Egypt stood a better chance of getting the goal chalked off if Salah had been outside the area. The VAR would merely be judging a foul – as was the case with Martinez – rather than a penalty.
Controversial? Absolutely. But it is hardly proof of a conspiracy in favour of Messi.
